The News
- Details
Guns made during the nineteenth century were built to last. They easily last more than one lifetime and finding a hundred year old gun that still shoots good isn't hard to do. I have a French shotgun that originally started out in life as a military musket, and several lives later, can still perform it's function as a 12 gauge shotgun. They were machined out of steel blocks, and the rifling cut the hard way.
People rarely have money to spend on that technology now. The guns made the old way, like the traditional Ballard hunting rifle shown below, are still being made, but are definitely going upmarket. On commercial guns, the receivers are now investment cast, not carved out of a solid chunk or steel. Barrels are button rifled or stamped with the rifling, and are fixed to the rifle with collars. Handguns are almost unrecognizable as a gun when disassembled, as they resemble automobile parts, like the Ruger LCR.
That's not to say I don't think these guns are any good. They are probably better than ever, and modern materials are light years ahead of the past. But will they last a hundred years? Without factory support and parts, and trained technicians I think not.
Weekend car shows at the local mall are full of old iron that the hobbyist repaired himself in his own garage. The way cars are built now, restoring a Mustang or Camaro will require plastic and electronic parts that won't be easily repairable, if at all, and guns will be the same way. You'll need a polymer piece, or some little sliver of titanium or some strangely shaped spring to get your handgun working again.
There is a bright note about modern guns. We're not using all this corrosive ammunition any more, so a barrel has a better chance to make that 100 year mark than ever.
- Details
The HMS Daring, the first of the £1.1bn type 45 class of British destroyers, gets a calling out by The Register. According to the story, the Daring has been practically unarmed for the last three years, finally getting, according to them, a practically useless missile (the Sea Viper) for anti-ship defense.
The Sea Viper isn't such a bad anti-missile missile, and probably is pretty effective for defense, but I think the whole thing boils down to the offensive armament. An Arleigh-Burke class destroyer has a similar main gun, but does have cruise missiles, anti-ship and anti-sub missiles. The Daring's anti-sub torpedos are born by their helicopter, along with Sea Skua anti-ship missiles. US destroyer defensive armament is also better, including phalanx guns, and for close in work, chain guns. The Daring has 30 mm Oerlikons, something that preceded phalanx guns and are less effective.
The Daring is heading for some upgrades, though. BAE is thinking about upgunning their 4.5 main gun to 155mm. Phalanx guns are on the list, and the launchers for anti-ship missiles, while not installed, are designed in. Fitting them would not require redesign of the ship. I suspect that if the UK gets itself into a serious shooting war, the ship will be upgraded quickly and put to work.